The entrepreneur posted a brief recommendation in response to a post by a user on X, who stated that Grok had already replaced several other AI tools and local models for him.
In the original post, the user on X recommended Grok Bot to those who aren’t yet using the tool. According to him, Grok had replaced OpenClaw, Hermes, and a local model that he ran on a Mac Mini costing about $10,000.
To expand the capabilities of this setup, the user also recommended using a Comet Pro Remote KVM device. According to his description, it allows the bot to remotely access a Mac environment. The device’s advertised features include 4K video transmission, Wi-Fi 6 support, and low latency.
Musk responded to the post with a very brief comment: “Try Grok @Bot!”
The entrepreneur’s comment is, in fact, a direct recommendation of his own AI product, though it does not provide details about its technical capabilities or a comparison with the solutions mentioned in the original post.
From Chatbot to AI Agent
A telling aspect of this story is the use case for Grok. It is no longer just about generating text or answering questions, but about giving AI access to the computer environment to perform tasks.
It is precisely this transition—from chatbots to agents capable of interacting with programs, files, and other computer resources—that is becoming one of the key areas of development for generative AI.
That said, claims regarding Grok’s effectiveness and its ability to replace specific tools in this case are based on a single user’s review and require independent verification. The same applies to estimates of cost savings from eliminating the need for on-premises models and hardware.
For the AI market, the development of such scenarios is significant, as competition is gradually shifting from the quality of a chatbot’s responses to its ability to autonomously perform a sequence of actions in a digital environment.
Follow our updates
