Marcel Bobeica: Moldova’s Local Government Reform Has Many Gaps
EUR/MDL - 20.05 0.2309
USD/MDL - 17.37 0.3228
VMS_91 - 3.03%
VMS_364 - 9.54%
BONDS_2Y - 7.40%
GOLD - 4,341.93 2.29%
EURUSD - 1.16 0%
BRENT - 83.76 1.92%
SP500 - 773.26 0.61%
SILVER - 63.53 3.31%
GAS - 2.89 8.25%

Marcel Bobeica: “There are many uncertainties surrounding the local government reform”

Marcel Bobeica, mayor of the commune of Gangura in the Yaloveț district and vice president of CALM, draws attention to the problems and ambiguities associated with local government reform in Moldova.
Tatiana Sichirliiscaia Reading time: 2 minutes
Text size
Link copied
Marcel Bobeica

Marcel Bobeica

Currently, the reform is focused exclusively on the idea of voluntary mergers of municipalities. There is talk of “larger and stronger administrations,” but there is no concrete plan regarding increasing administrative capacity, attracting external funding, managing cultural heritage, or implementing European policies—65% of which must be implemented at the local level.

The mayor notes that the ongoing discussions do not address the issue of the division of powers. It is unclear who will bear which responsibilities after the reform. The introduction of the position of “mayor’s representative” is being discussed, but it is unknown what powers this person will have or how they will be appointed or elected.

The authorities plan to expand unified service management centers, but there is no clear legislation, it is unknown who will coordinate them (the mayor, the council, other government bodies), the source of funding has not been established, and access to population registries and civil registry offices is blocked, which hinders the work of local administrations.

The problem lies in the lack of fiscal decentralization 

However, the main problem lies in the lack of fiscal decentralization. Many city administrations have no revenue of their own and will remain ineffective, and the proposed budgetary and fiscal policy does not increase—but rather reduces—their revenue, taxes on business activities and personal income are not being redirected to municipalities, contrary to promises. And without their own resources, city authorities will not be able to become strong.

Uncertainty also persists regarding the organization of the second level (districts): their powers have not been defined, the transfer of assets is not regulated, and it is unclear what will remain at the local level and what will be transferred to the regional level.

The reform is being carried out in haste, without in-depth consultations with citizens and local authorities. Therefore, although it is necessary, it risks becoming rushed and ineffective, which could reduce the level of local autonomy.


Follow our updates


Реклама недоступна
Related*
More from author*

We always appreciate your feedback!

Latest news
Popular now*
Must Read*