“5+2” format questioned in Transnistria talks debate
English
EUR/MDL - 20.16 0.1188
USD/MDL - 17.12 0.5801
VMS_91 - 3.03%
VMS_364 - 9.54%
BONDS_2Y - 7.40%
GOLD - 4,831.17 0.01%
EURUSD - 1.18 0%
BRENT - 103.13 45.48%
SP500 - 710.14 1.21%
SILVER - 80.81 0%
GAS - 3.04 16.02%

Opinion on the format of negotiations on the Transdniestrian settlement: “Diplomacy requires dialog even with inconvenient partners”

This is how the initiative of Parliament Speaker Igor Grosu to abandon the 5+2 format and create a new negotiating mechanism for the Transnistrian settlement was commented by the chairman of the Alliance of Moldovans party, Dumitru Roibu.
Татьяна Шикирлийская Reading time: 1 minute
Link copied
"Alliance Moldavan" Dumitru-Roibu

According to the politician, it is important not only to recognize that the “5+2” format does not function today, but also to understand whether the proposed alternative is capable of bringing real results.

“A new format of negotiations without real parity will turn the Transnistrian settlement into a fruitless political game,” Roibu believes. – “It is not enough to declare the format ‘dead’ for the reality on the ground to change. The conflict reflects real interests and influences, and the new structure should take these factors into account”.

He notes the need to speed up the search for solutions for the country’s reintegration, pointing to the geopolitical importance of solving the Transnistrian issue.

The principle of parity is necessary

At the same time, the politician emphasizes that the former format had an important advantage – the participation of all parties, including Russia. “It is impossible to build a stable negotiation mechanism excluding one of the participants. Diplomacy requires dialog even with inconvenient partners,” the politician said.
Commenting on the proposal for a new format with the participation of such parties as the European Union, the United States, Romania and Ukraine, Dumitru Roibu expressed doubts about respecting the principle of parity and trust.
In his opinion, the participation of predominantly parties in tense relations with Russia may undermine the balance of the negotiations and reduce the chances of achieving real progress.



Реклама недоступна
Must Read*
Politics & Economy
20 April 2026
Investments & Markets
20 April 2026
Global Economy
20 April 2026
Politics & Economy
20 April 2026
Economy & Law
20 April 2026

We always appreciate your feedback!

Read also