Send us a message, and we will definitely consider your suggestions and comments.
Category: Logos Press Exclusive
Is artificial intelligence transforming the economy in any real sense, or are promises of rapid growth just hype? U.S. stock markets certainly lean toward the former view: AI and technology stocks have accounted for about three-quarters of the gains in the S&P 500 index this year. Venture capitalists seem convinced as well, with one estimate suggesting that $200 billion has been injected into the AI sector in 2025 alone.
Demographic studies by numerous think tanks correctly warn that by 2050 Europe will face unsustainable costs and social burdens due to an aging population. But they are ignored, calling them speculation and alarmism. European officials react with silence. The continent’s political parties studiously avoid the topic, fearing the electoral consequences of the necessary reforms.
Decarbonization of energy systems relies heavily on wind and solar power. Fortunately, the cost of solar energy is falling rapidly, and combined with the inexpensive batteries that are now available, solar power has become a competitive and reliable source of energy in sunny areas. But while wind power provides more energy than solar, its use has been slower to expand, in part because of opposition from politicians and local communities.
There is no doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the global economy at an unprecedented rate. But will it relieve rich countries of their increased debt burden, especially as rapidly aging populations increase the burden of social security costs? And if so, will these countries be able to quietly increase their budget deficits, effectively borrowing at the expense of the super-rich future generations?
In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), US President Donald Trump said he had “put an end to seven endless wars” and condemned the UN for its inaction.
Twenty democracies, representing both the Global North and the Global South, gathered at the UN on September 24 to not only reaffirm their commitment to democracy, but to develop a plan of action that will sustain and enrich it.
In the early 1940s, as World War II raged in Europe, Stefan Zweig’s memoir Die Welt von Gestern: Erinnerungen eines Europäers (“Yesterday’s World: Memories of a European”) was published by a German émigré publishing house in Stockholm. Zweig, full of sadness, describes the “rupture of time” that brought old Europe to an end in the fury of two terrible world wars.
In an era of shifting geopolitics, many countries’ strategic planning involves imaginative exercises to strengthen their position in the world. While Russia and China have had moderate success in this game, America’s efforts have already boomeranged.
Recently, it has become almost impossible to ignore media coverage of artificial intelligence. The accelerating progress of the technology is seen as an inevitability, a prospect that evokes both excitement and existential fear of the future. Judging by the inflated stock valuations of companies at the forefront of the industry, the markets seem convinced that we have entered a technological revolution.
It’s September in Washington, and everyone knows what that means: the U.S. Congress is trying…
Since the economic boom under Reagan in the ’80s, many foreign elites have been telling Americans that they have been duped: that tax cuts and deregulation are a reckless and unnecessary way to stimulate economic growth. They claim that countries that pay generous child subsidies and entangle businesses in paperwork bureaucracies still have the same level of income. Why, then, put up with the rough-and-tumble of cowboy economics?
Since returning to the White House, U.S. President Donald Trump has set a course to cut foreign aid. His administration eliminated the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), reducing the number of programs from more than 6,000 to fewer than 900. In late August, Trump renewed his assault on foreign aid, announcing the cancellation of $4.9 billion in congressionally approved aid through a rarely used mechanism that the Government Accountability Office ruled illegal in 2018.
