Дмитрий Тэрэбуркэ

The story about the valuation of assets on the territory of the former Republican Stadium is not a dispute about methodology or a conflict of figures. It is an illustrative demonstration of how in Moldova the legal procedure turns into a controlled ritual, and state institutions – into participants of a political spectacle, where the law is read only when it is profitable.

When talking about Venezuela, everything is reduced to the slogan: “The U.S. came for oil”. This is convenient, but fundamentally wrong. Venezuela is not a “banana republic” that you can carry under your arm. Yes, it has colossal reserves (about 303 billion barrels), but due to years of devastation, the country produces only 1% of the world’s oil.

Price is not the main argument in the Republican Stadium story at all. Price reflects only the market – if it exists – and even this market has been ignored here. But the interests of Moldova and its citizens are not measured in square meters or euros per meter. They are measured by the possibility for Moldovans to use this land. And this is where a separate story begins, much more unpleasant than talking about price.

Against the background of loud statements about reforms aimed at increasing transparency and professionalism in the real estate sector, the draft law on the activity of real estate agents in Moldova raises serious concerns. Under the guise of good intentions, a model of centralized control, far from the European principles of regulation, is actually laid down. And, what is especially alarming – it is transferred into the hands of an institution whose reputation has already been repeatedly questioned.

When the Prima Casa program was launched in Moldova in 2018, it was positioned as a large-scale social initiative – a chance for young families to find their own housing with state support. Today, several years later, Prima Casă has turned into a source of uncertainty, debt traps and social tensions. Instead of a sustainable solution to the housing problem, we got an overheated market, disguised incentives for the banking sector and the state’s withdrawal from its own obligations.